Non Sequitur in Legal
On this page you will find the legal definition and meaning of Non Sequitur, written in plain English, as well as examples of how it is used. : (nahn sek [as in heck]-kwit-her) Latin for “he does not follow”. The term generally means that a conclusion does not follow logically from the facts or the law: “This is a non sequitur”. Non-sequiturs are often used for comic effects in movies, novels, and television shows. When someone says a non sequitur, it usually means that the person was gone in their own thoughts and was not listening to the other person. Imagine a girl saying, “I`m afraid my sister is angry with me” and her friend says, “I wonder what you call a male ladybug?” The non sequitur shows that the friend was clearly not listening. A non sequitur is a conclusion or response that does not follow logically from the preceding statement. You`ve probably heard an example of non sequitur, so rabbits are much cuter than chipmunks. In Latin, non sequitur means “he does not follow”. The term was borrowed into English in the 1500s by people doing a formal study of logic.
For them, this meant a conclusion that does not follow from the statements that led to it. But we now use non sequitur for any type of statement that seems to come out of nowhere. The Latin verb sequi (“to follow”) actually paved the way for a number of English words. A sequel follows the original novel, film or TV series. One who is submissive follows another, flattering and laughing. And an action is often followed by its consequences. Thesaurus: All synonyms and antonyms for non sequitur Non sequitur is a Latin term meaning “he does not follow” and usually refers to drawing a conclusion according to logical reasoning, or that a conclusion does not follow logically from facts or law. This occurs when an action or event is not related to previous events. These may be errors when one or more premises are irrelevant to a conclusion and the conclusion is in fact arbitrary. Common law principles (theories of tort negligence) and a key statute of state law require reasonableness. While the legal criteria for legal adequacy in law are relatively vague and tend to be raised by a number of precedents, the crucial point is the word “reason”: can the conclusion be inferred from its premises? A Latin term meaning “he does not follow,” meaning that no logical conclusion was drawn without following the legal facts. Previous events in the case were not taken into account prior to the decision.
“A statement (e.g. a response) that does not follow logically from what has been said before.” .